I just checked Teresa Neilsen Hayden's blog Making Light for the first time in months and the latest (Oct. 11) entry pleased me deeply....putting me strongly in mind of a young woman I used to know who had the Worst Experience of Her Life at least once a year. Our national version of that is to declare we've Lost Our Innocence every time some unpleasant event creates a major psychic upheaval. Yesterday I got three pieces of e-mail in a row that referred to the WTC bombing as our National Loss of Innocence...We love her, but let's face it: America is a chronic drama queen. To quote Dan Victor,
Loss of Innocence is the theme of every major American event, including assassinations. It's an American staple. The Vietnam War: The end of our Innocence! The Kennedy Assassination: The end of our Innocence! Watergate: The end of our Innocence! The Clinton Impeachment: The end of our Innocence! Now, the Columbine killings, the Innocence of the American High School lost! As a society we love to entertain this view of ourselves.
...Perhaps it's time to stop protesting our innocence, and behave ourselves like grownups instead. To know next to nothing about the world -- and as a nation, that's been our preferred state of affairs -- is the innocence of a small child. But we're not small children; and in an adult that same lack of knowledge is willful ignorance. To have power, to act in the world without knowing the consequences, is dangerous negligence. Even our friends and allies find us maddening that way.
Yes, we mean well. They do give us points for that. But it's not enough to mean well.
Frankly I'm not sure exactly where I stand re: the Great Liberation of Kabul et al. Now that The Obvious Response has been enacted, I think that if the US doesn't hit a home run here, things could easily go terribly haywire. A "home run" would be "Marshall Planning" all of Central Asia (all 5 'stans), getting financial help form other countries to achieve this, quickly putting the search for alt.fuels in to high gear, and doing everything possible to establish open, multi-level (government, corporate, NGO and grass roots) dialogues with all countries with intentions beyond draining their resources and "disposable income."
The "Marshall Plan" will be longer, more complex and more challenging than the original, for several reasons, not least of which is the greater technological gap between the US and Europe and the Arab peoples, and the centuries-old enmity based on what are essentially differences rooted in spiritual belief systems which have the same root and thus compete with the special viciousness of siblings (as we see most graphically between the Jews and the Muslims). Ancient yearnings for tribal hegemony--the most memorable recent example surfaced in 1930s Germany--have survived mostly through the persistent affiliation and identification of spiritual feeling with dominant monotheistic religions (and Hinduism) in their fundamentalist, exclusionary extremes.
I'll stop now. This issue brings up so many things, I could go on forever.
Letting the fear and anger go, reuniting science and spirituality, recognizing an essential unity without denying diversity. It's going to be a long, bumpy ride, but I think we'll get there. Maybe even in my lifetime (by the 2040s).